My Journey into Sanatana Dharma

In the view of evolution being a fact, and that we humans are as much animals as animals are, the reasons we give to eat meat by killing animals, technically our fellow beings, even though we have other options available to consume, to survive, is akin to a cannibal eating other humans even though he had other options to consume to survive. Hence I say, legalizing cannibalism should logically make sense, until killing animals for consumption even though there are other options available, is made illegal and a crime. Even Jesus said, "Thou shalt not Kill" he didn't Say, "thou shalt not kill a human". There is a big difference. what do you think? Think!

LMAO! Just heard this speech by Sam Harris, a neuro-scientist, a prominent anti-theist, may be even an atheist here is talking about how "free will" is an illusion. He obviously is a very accomplished neuro-scientist, so he knows the science he is talking about. The rest of it is actually something all of us can understand just based on pure personal experience. After Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, I think Sam Harris completes triad/trinity of atheist god fathers for atheists world over. Now he has written a book on free will which I need to read (I will soon) but purely based on this speech right here: I actually will argue he is advocating the need for religion in society without he realizing that. He makes a very basic fundamental mistake in assuming something that makes his whole argument wrong about free will. In fact this speech also ties in to the philosophy of Ancient Indian Astrology, if you understand what he is saying about the nature of &q