Spirituality is nothing but the result of religious skepticism
I've just scribbled my thoughts that just came for the past 40 mins... i'll clean it up later when have time...but try to follow the logic and let me know where i am completely off or faltering. There sure is a lot to clarify below..but a nice read nevertheless I think.
Post beings here:
you see the thing is no one in today's
world especially has the time to go over everything out there. Even if they did,
there is a good chance they will go insane. even if they don't they might lack
the intelligence to put it all in to context.
A realist says he will believe only empirical
evidence. this pursuit of empirical evidence is all nice and good and as good
as and as entertaining to someone like
me as is Kim Kardashian showing her ass on national TV.
The issue for most ppl other than this
small minor percentage of ppl is that they all recognize the only inevitable in
front of them. And that is death. And it is human nature to worry about it.
What is beyond that veil? And that is what drives ppl to go toward religion.
Until science can empirically prove there is nothing beyond, which they cannot
they will not be able to remove the fear of death from ppl.
life is limited. even if u can extend life
to 150-200 yrs..it is still limited. immortality is an impossibility and
meaningless really (different discussion). so this fear will not go away. you
might say many ppl in europe do no associate with any religion..that doesn't
mean they dont fear death that just means that the existing frameworks or
understandings to deal with thsi problem with available religion has left them
disillusioned, they dont see how abrahmic religious doctrines with all those
holes solve it for them. coz to an inquisitive and educated mind mere
"belief" is a phenomenally hollow argument. Especially with glaring
holes of the problems of free will, age of the earth/universe and the facts of
evolution flying directly in the face of the popular versions of these
religions.
ask a scientist why he wants to know..he
says for adventure... really? is that the only way one can experience adventure
and awe? unless they can answer ppl definitively abt the problem of death, most
ppl will not follow them except to make a pay check or for entertainment
purposes. Coz trust me, I love all these discoveries, its terrifically the most
entertaining part of my life today to read abt them and watch all the
informative discussions and documentaries on youtube. But at the end of the day
I need to deal with this problem of the inevitable. The only inevitable. That I
know for a fact is true for everyone, they admit it or not. The modes of
entertainment just differs. For some its Kim Kardashian's ass, for some its the
visuals of a supernova, for some its playing and following cricket.
So, will science ever be able to
empirically prove/disprove what is beyond death? May be..maybe not. Do any of
us have an unlimited amount of time to get to that d ecidion point? NO. Then
What are you real options now?
1. Do nothing. Live and die like an animal
experiencing " awe", entertaining ourselves, experiencing
"adventure". All these experiences
come and go. experiencing +ves and negatives. if this makes you
comfortable.. do it. just dont let science get in to the hands of the powerful
who will and are hell bent on destroying planet earth and threaten our very
existence as beyond animals.
2. Believe in the religion you are born in
to. and hope that just believing will "save" you. i say if that makes
you comfortable do it. except of course you have to ignore the glaring holes in
these philosophies and "truths" mentioned above. And when you do
ignore them, you also fall in to the trap of violence that is established and
used by these doctrines throughout history.
3. Eliminating these faith based books
becomes easy because of established science. Its a slam dunk. I am not even
sure why there is so much debate regarding all this. these "perfect"
books have glaring holes and falsified scientific theories if read literally.
OF course a different discussion blog would be: If we dont take these books
literally and interpret them some other way, I have deduced a few things
personally with limited knowledge that they all are sayng the same thing that
the Upanishads have said a millenia before these religions were
born/written/conceived. But as I said, its a different discussion. And in this
case All of the religions, at least the major ones are saying the same thing as
already recognized by the lesser popular versions of these, notably the sufis
in Islam, a few teachers in christianity like St. Francis of Assisi, etc.
4. if u r already born in to
"Hinduism", well again there are so many to chose from. Its mind
boggling.
But here again, let science be the support
to hold on to the ladder of spirituality that answers the most difficult
questions of all regarding consciousness, death, nature of reality etc. Spirituality I think is far ahead of science and answers questions that science is clearing backing off of from today. The thing is, there is a fundamental different in how empirical evidence is gathered in spirituality. going inside. Looking inside. Deep meditative states. etc.
But i digress.
Double
slit experiment, quantum entanglement are the two most important clues to
realize the nature of reality. That what we see and perceive is an illusion.
And that there is the all encompassing fabric of the cosmos that transcends the
universe that is not two but one. does this seem like a massive jump?
Scientifically..may be. inferential ...not so much. Again, how long are you
willing to wait? How long CAN you really wait? Your life is still limited. It is now known that through meditation and yoga, one can control
the flow of thoughts and access level of subconscious that hint at the nature
of reality. It is now known that through these practices one can transcend
pain. Its only is possible now that one can transcend desires or wants. we
cannot transcend the absolute needs of the body (needs further explanation). it also just further needs to be deduced through understanding of consciousness and meditative states that when you kill your ego the nature of reality shines forth and we experiences
the reality, not as the illusory particles that pop into existence when a
conscious entity looks at it but in this state the electron no longer appears.
the language used in the upanishads is EXACTLY this. we just use the words of
gold and chain for the understanding of the general public.
if anything all this points to this: at
least when you start mediting and doing yoga over the years based on your level
of consciousness and how well you do it, you will start seeing the updates.
that is the dare. It took decades and billions of dollars to get a hint at the
god particle. we can't really see it, things this mysterious take that long.
what did we gain by the god particle? may be just more power to destroy
ourselves. and then once we are dead we haven't really gone anywhere. but if u
spend the same time meditating morning and evening for 1 hr (hedge your bets)
perhaps you will discover these things yourself. isn't that pragmatic? Isn't
that empirical? The experience of love can only be described in words and
chemicals..maybe..but unless one experiences it you can never know what that
REALLY means. The same is true for "god realization" u see that is
the term that we have always used... god realization, we didnt say...to see
god. to be with god etc in the most esoteric language. realization is an experience
that cannot be proven or understood by external empiricism, but to be
experienced by one self. so skeptics, need to stand true to their own
philosophy...go do these experiments yourself and see for your self. do not
trust anyone. in the end... if there REALLY is nothing, no one has lost
anything...coz its already proven that in those meditative states you can
transcend pain and even hunger for anything beyond the basics. And meditative
experiences also give you the same awe and adventure. Just ask someone who has
been meditating.
Comments